|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 9, 2011 23:21:42 GMT
Well there goes his credibility!
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 9, 2011 23:22:18 GMT
Carol Everett who is she and what has she done. Should she be on the Big BadPsychics List? Yes. Well if you believe her website www.caroleverett.com/ce-crime/ce-crime.htm She has interfered in the police investigations of the following cases which are mostly high profile murder or abduction. JONBENET RAMSEY. RACHEL NICKELL NICOLA PARSONS WASHINGTON SNIPER IVY BATTEN. NATALIE PEARMAN JESSICA & HOLLY KATE BUSHELL. DANNIELLE JONES MILLIE DOWLER GENETTE TATE.. ABBIE HUMPHRIES. SANDRA PARKINSON. BUCKINGHAM PALACE THEFTS DUNCAN GRAY PETER WICKENS. JO YEATES All she does is distress relatives, as well as draw portraits that could resemble innocent people and are way off the mark of the persons convicted. She confuses the investigations wastes precious time and protecting kidnapers and murderers by confusing their prosecutions? She claims to be scientifically tested for healing, diagnosis & telepathic ability. However in the test she could see the already diagnosed person so her diagnoses was probably by sight due to the patient giving away visual clues. And most damming to the claim that Carol Everett healed is the statement “I intend to do further experiments in order to find out that the Patient has actually been healed.” By Professor Yoshio Machi. This is the same Prof who tested Natalia Demkina, the girl who claimed she could see inside peoples bodies and diagnose conditions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natasha_DemkinaIt would seem that this professor is definitely working with operator bias, and does not use proper scientific method. The fact he only tested Carol Everett once goes to prove that. Something absolutely disgusting is the fake cancer advice email on her website. www.caroleverett.com/ph-healing.htmThis is from Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center about the email. www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_ca...._is_a_hoax.html"CANCER UPDATE FROM JOHN HOPKINS" The Truth about the "Cancer Update" Email “It has become such a problem, that the National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and individual cancer centers like the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center have posted warnings on their Web sites. Emails offering easy remedies for avoiding and curing cancer are the latest Web-influenced trend. To gain credibility, the anonymous authors falsely attribute their work to respected research institutions like Johns Hopkins. This is the case with the so-called “Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins.”
The gist of this viral email is that cancer therapies of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy do not work against the disease and people should instead choose a variety of dietary strategies.
Traditional therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, work. The evidence is the millions of cancer survivors in the United States today who are alive because of these therapies. We recognize that treatments don’t work in every patient, or sometimes work for awhile and then stop working, and there are some cancers that are more difficult to cure than others. These problems are the focus of ongoing cancer research. “By placing the fake Johns email on her website for her benefit, she puts cancer suffers in harms way. And believe it or not she also infers she can treat cancer which is a possible breach of the 1939 Cancer Act. (note. I have used a few of Admins words) Is there anything here the press may like. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 10, 2011 12:26:59 GMT
Had en email back from Clive from consumerdirect - southwest
Have sent some more info to him which will be sent to TS to make them aware of this trader and their business practices. What they do next I am unsure, but as it is to do with cancer claims I am hoping they will act
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 10, 2011 13:27:02 GMT
Just got this.
Thank you for your enquiry to Consumer Direct dated 10th January 2011.
Your reference number for this case is SW****** and should be quoted in
all further correspondence regarding this case.
Thank you very much for taking the time to update us with the required
information. I have referred the case details to the relevant Trading
Standards department for their information, to ensure that they are
aware of this trader and their business practices.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 10, 2011 20:14:33 GMT
Thanks Admin
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 10, 2011 21:41:03 GMT
I just hope they do something
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 20, 2011 14:56:39 GMT
Just in It may be just to help the police look in to this person in more detail. Jo Yeates murder inquiry: 32-year-old man arrested The 32-year-old man arrested on suspicion of murdering Joanna Yeates is believed to be her neighbour Vincent Tabak. A 32-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of the murder of landscape architect Jo Yeates. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-12238262From the Star Carol described the killer she saw as of mixed race, 5ft 11in to 6ft tall and in his early 20s. She said the second man was 5ft 8in to 5ft 10in tall with fair hair. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 20, 2011 16:36:58 GMT
Lets wait and see if he gets charged with murder
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 23, 2011 11:50:50 GMT
I have viewed the video of Professor Yoshio Machi testing Carol Everett's Healing work. Now I know it will be vary hard on the persons being tested, but would it possible to setup the same experiment at the next sceptics conference, as I volunteer to be tested even I know it will be very hard thing for me to do? It is a test of body heat. What happens is you will need to find a naked young lady who would be willing to stand in front of me while I pretended to have my eyes closed to see if doing this would make her body heat drop. I would be willing to share the burden of being tested with other members of this forum. caroleverett.com/video/denkitokyo512.html |
|
|
|
Post by morganp on Jan 24, 2011 10:05:18 GMT
Well, looks like Carol got this one wrong. Vincent Tabak has now been charged with murdering Jo Yeates. Of course there's always the possibility the Police could be wrong but that's for the Jury to decide.
morganp
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 24, 2011 10:35:37 GMT
I am making a webpage on Public Nuisances in my real name to be about a person with no powers, but by pretending powers has or is is making a nuisance of themselves.
I will let the Jury to decide if she goes on my site.
In a town like Bristol with race problems she cannot get away with saying the killer was of mixed race unchallenged.
Think what it must have been like to have been a man of mixed race, in his early 20s living near Jo Yeates for the last few weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by morganp on Jan 24, 2011 10:56:22 GMT
In a town like Bristol with race problems she cannot get away with saying the killer was of mixed race unchallenged.
Quite right Lucan - totally irresponsible with no thought for the potential consequences.
morganp
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on Jan 24, 2011 11:18:51 GMT
Yes the Jury has to decide. but there is great TV here for the Admins, as there is lots of visual material.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucan on May 5, 2011 13:35:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by farsideofthemoon on May 6, 2011 23:02:32 GMT
Well done Carol - spot on again!  |
|
