Post by farsideofthemoon on Feb 2, 2008 8:55:18 GMT
And the our friend Kensington turns up, still too embarassed to admit Sally Morgan had him fooled:
--------------------------------------------
Hi guys, yes Jon banned me from Bad Psychics. Lol. Jon just answer the question about Gary instead of going round in circles. Just give us an answer for goodness sake. I have nothing against Jon but he seems to be rather terrified and threatened by me all because I told him about my experiences with Sally Morgan. He says I won't give him the tape of my meeting with her in Feb 2005. It's being handed to one of Australia's leading and most respected sceptics Richard Saunders this very Thursday who will transcribe it, interpret it and MP3 it to Jon. Sally may well be a con artist, deluded, bonkers or even genuine. I just felt that she believed in what she was doing however bonkers or genuine she may be. I told Jon Donnis about this and played him extracts from the tape. He came back with stuff that wasn't true even denying I have ever been a journalist or an actor. All these things can easily be checked. He even claimed there was no tape and even said he believed I could be related to Sally. I mean talking about being ridiculous Jon takes the biscuit. Many psychics record private readings on tape, CD etc for the client. It's pretty standard practice. You'd think being the "UK's leading sceptic" he would know that. Any way he will get the MP3 of the tape and I look forward to that apology. I hope thaat will be the end of it.
Jon says he is not nasty yet he wrote on his forum that I was ten times lower than pond scum. Yes this is the level of his argument. You know there are all sorts of people out there yet to him I am pond scum. I'd love to know what he thinks of the really bad ones. To argue with him you have to image you are a ten year old in the play ground. I've seen worse. He denies he calls psychics trash then later on this very forum he admits they are trash. It is quite common for him to contradict himself. He is terrified of me having any contact with those he knows. When Kendra from Esoteric Online got in contact with me he was furious and now that I have met Richard Saunders and am going to a sceptics meeting in Sydney he has blown a gasket.
He has fallen out with many sceptics including myself and Brendan who runs Skeptic Eye. We dislike his style of accusing without evidence. Other people on his site such as Meercat and Dippy seem to do good research on many people but sadly Jon has a bit of a way to go. The likes of Meercat and Dippy and Jon's cousin Nik who launched the site seem to be the one carrying it a long. Jon is merely the court jester and is used to confront people on the front line really as cannon fodder.
Yes Jon did do a mediumship course for six months but he actually only turned up to five or six sessions so hardly full time. Interesting that Jon admits he made up a lot of things on the course so why should we believe him now? His view is that while he can make accusations he doesn't have any responsibility to back them up or prove mediums are liars. He says the onus of proof is on them. Yes it may well be but it is also on him. If he wants others to back up their claims he must back up his.
He asks why people don't sue. In fact he has been threatened with legal action before and had to retract claims. Just ask Kendra. The main reason people don't sue is that there is little point. It's time consuming, can be expensive and why bother with a little website like badpsychics. Jon makes very little money so in fact if you won you wouldn't get much. Indeed people have called Jon a liar and worse yet he never sues either. I'd love to know why.
Jon is indeed a guy who has too much time to waste. He once joked to me how he loved being his own boss. The sad thing is he is a slave to himself and his many websites. They have become his life and obsession. I can close off but he can't. It's become his life. I like the guy and in some ways feel sorry for him. I think he will mellow in time. I admire his aim to expose con artists but sadly along the way he has lost the track. Let's be honest most of those psychics that he has tried to expose including Colin are still working and making lots of money so sadly his site is not having enough effetc
Jon I think is a publicity seeker who uses insults as a way to gain attention and it's his main way to argue. When the other person's arguments become too tough or too difficult for him to handle then he retreats and bans the person from his forum as he did me. The only thing I ask of Jon is to do his research before he accuses. In other words think before he acts. Too much foot in mouth. But I would certainly not ban him from this forum. Let him have his say. His insults are for effect. Don't take them too seriously and don't pay him too much attention. Thanks guys William
---------------------------------------------------
All here:
spiritlove.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=156&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45
--------------------------------------------
Hi guys, yes Jon banned me from Bad Psychics. Lol. Jon just answer the question about Gary instead of going round in circles. Just give us an answer for goodness sake. I have nothing against Jon but he seems to be rather terrified and threatened by me all because I told him about my experiences with Sally Morgan. He says I won't give him the tape of my meeting with her in Feb 2005. It's being handed to one of Australia's leading and most respected sceptics Richard Saunders this very Thursday who will transcribe it, interpret it and MP3 it to Jon. Sally may well be a con artist, deluded, bonkers or even genuine. I just felt that she believed in what she was doing however bonkers or genuine she may be. I told Jon Donnis about this and played him extracts from the tape. He came back with stuff that wasn't true even denying I have ever been a journalist or an actor. All these things can easily be checked. He even claimed there was no tape and even said he believed I could be related to Sally. I mean talking about being ridiculous Jon takes the biscuit. Many psychics record private readings on tape, CD etc for the client. It's pretty standard practice. You'd think being the "UK's leading sceptic" he would know that. Any way he will get the MP3 of the tape and I look forward to that apology. I hope thaat will be the end of it.
Jon says he is not nasty yet he wrote on his forum that I was ten times lower than pond scum. Yes this is the level of his argument. You know there are all sorts of people out there yet to him I am pond scum. I'd love to know what he thinks of the really bad ones. To argue with him you have to image you are a ten year old in the play ground. I've seen worse. He denies he calls psychics trash then later on this very forum he admits they are trash. It is quite common for him to contradict himself. He is terrified of me having any contact with those he knows. When Kendra from Esoteric Online got in contact with me he was furious and now that I have met Richard Saunders and am going to a sceptics meeting in Sydney he has blown a gasket.
He has fallen out with many sceptics including myself and Brendan who runs Skeptic Eye. We dislike his style of accusing without evidence. Other people on his site such as Meercat and Dippy seem to do good research on many people but sadly Jon has a bit of a way to go. The likes of Meercat and Dippy and Jon's cousin Nik who launched the site seem to be the one carrying it a long. Jon is merely the court jester and is used to confront people on the front line really as cannon fodder.
Yes Jon did do a mediumship course for six months but he actually only turned up to five or six sessions so hardly full time. Interesting that Jon admits he made up a lot of things on the course so why should we believe him now? His view is that while he can make accusations he doesn't have any responsibility to back them up or prove mediums are liars. He says the onus of proof is on them. Yes it may well be but it is also on him. If he wants others to back up their claims he must back up his.
He asks why people don't sue. In fact he has been threatened with legal action before and had to retract claims. Just ask Kendra. The main reason people don't sue is that there is little point. It's time consuming, can be expensive and why bother with a little website like badpsychics. Jon makes very little money so in fact if you won you wouldn't get much. Indeed people have called Jon a liar and worse yet he never sues either. I'd love to know why.
Jon is indeed a guy who has too much time to waste. He once joked to me how he loved being his own boss. The sad thing is he is a slave to himself and his many websites. They have become his life and obsession. I can close off but he can't. It's become his life. I like the guy and in some ways feel sorry for him. I think he will mellow in time. I admire his aim to expose con artists but sadly along the way he has lost the track. Let's be honest most of those psychics that he has tried to expose including Colin are still working and making lots of money so sadly his site is not having enough effetc
Jon I think is a publicity seeker who uses insults as a way to gain attention and it's his main way to argue. When the other person's arguments become too tough or too difficult for him to handle then he retreats and bans the person from his forum as he did me. The only thing I ask of Jon is to do his research before he accuses. In other words think before he acts. Too much foot in mouth. But I would certainly not ban him from this forum. Let him have his say. His insults are for effect. Don't take them too seriously and don't pay him too much attention. Thanks guys William
---------------------------------------------------
All here:
spiritlove.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=156&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45