|
Post by Mestor on Mar 29, 2008 14:27:53 GMT
When Yvette was talking about the sounds been echos last night did Cirean say high pitched sounds don't echo?
What about bats?
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Mar 29, 2008 14:46:44 GMT
everything can echo, i believe its the length of the echo that changes
|
|
|
Post by Mestor on Mar 29, 2008 14:49:56 GMT
everything can echo, i believe its the length of the echo that changes Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Meercat on Mar 29, 2008 19:07:33 GMT
everything can echo, i believe its the length of the echo that changes And don't believe all that stuff about 'a duck's quack doesn't echo' either. It does.
|
|
|
Post by plumbduff on Mar 29, 2008 20:28:55 GMT
My trumps echo
|
|
|
Post by Annie UK on Mar 30, 2008 21:19:00 GMT
everything can echo, i believe its the length of the echo that changes And don't believe all that stuff about 'a duck's quack doesn't echo' either. It does. Mythbusters have proved that duck quacks echo
|
|
|
Post by jaroon on Apr 2, 2008 23:14:45 GMT
Hello everybody,
This is my first reply since a long time. In my experience as a sound engineer, I know that al sounds echo. Only higher ond lower frequencies are difficult to pinpoint, because of the shorter and longer wavelenghts. Maybe CiarĂ¡n was refering to that. Also higher frequencies are easier absorbed by walls and fabrics.
greetings Jeroen
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Apr 2, 2008 23:21:14 GMT
Welcome to the forum Jeroen
|
|
|
Post by starx on Apr 3, 2008 12:56:52 GMT
Welcome back hun
|
|
|
Post by steje73 on Apr 3, 2008 13:03:49 GMT
If high pitched sounds didn't echo, you'd only have to listen to Joe Pasquale once.
|
|
|
Post by mookster on Apr 3, 2008 13:59:24 GMT
Hello.......hello......hello...............................................................is there an echo in here or is it me....lol
|
|