|
|
Post by antmania on Jun 4, 2006 9:35:27 GMT
Absolutely facinating Documentary. Who cares if it is true, makes great viewing. Don't ya just love american conspiricy theorires? |
|
|
|
Post by antmania on Jun 10, 2006 7:46:05 GMT
I must admit there was something deeply suspicious about the towers and the surrounding buildings collapsing. There were so many reports of explosions prior to the collapse. And the fact that these buildings were the first ever to fall due to a fire is revealing in itself.
Also very strange how they found a highjackers passport INTACT despite the entire plane being obliterated.
If in fact this was an insider job, it seems clear the american goverment planned this very well so no evidence would be discovered revealing the true reason for 9-11.
A very compelling viewing nonetheless whatever the truth behind it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by PILLSBURY on Jul 7, 2006 18:27:34 GMT
The reason that the twin towers were attacked twice was that the terrorists believed that the computers in the building controlled all the worlds money transactions and if they detsroyed them ,then anarchy would reign. Of course disaster management and planning and simple globalisation means that all financial organisations have redundancies in their systems and no effect on global transaction was noticed. Also the construction of the pentagon was upgraded in the 50's to cater for nuclear explosion. THe plane was basically incinerated inside the building and that is why there was so little wreckage.The same people who peddle this rubbish do the same with Princess Diana, she died ina car crash because she didnt have a seat belt on, enough said. rant over
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jinx on Jul 25, 2006 13:01:19 GMT
Anyone that believes the twin towers were brought down by a conspiracy should read this - www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.htmlAgain the most logical reason for this not being a conspiracy is the number of people that would need to be in on it. The more people involved the more likely someone is going to blab. |
|
|
|
Post by paddygc on Jul 27, 2006 6:36:54 GMT
tbh i see no conspiracy at all in the WTC collapses.
The pentagon could be a different matter, and something around that explosion stinks of cover-up.
But then the americans (and us for that matter) cover-up everything, its second nature to them. They are not a honest system - so even if there is nothing untoward they still feel the need to concoct daft cover stories
My personal thoughts: Pentagon was probably a suicide bomber who drove a van into the side of the building. For some reason they feel the need to cover up the first suicide bombing on american soil (if you discount the planes anyway)
What happened to the plane? Probably shot down, but would you want to have to say that you shot down a plane with xx number of innocent passengers onboard?
P
|
|
|
|
Post by claire on Aug 10, 2006 20:30:50 GMT
My computer wont let me watch the vid!! But im not sure i want too, there may be loads of theories flying about but at the end of the day a heck of a lot of innocent people died and tho i dont think we should forget, i dont think it can be good for the victims families to have to hear and see all of it, and have it replayed and analysed over and over again
|
|
|
|
Post by antmania on Aug 13, 2006 11:21:10 GMT
Two books which may be of interest to people here are "The new Pearl Harbour" and "911 comission, ommissions and distortions" both by David Ray Griffin.
He goes into great detail and looks at all the alternatives and his conclusions are that the 911 comission was a total lie from start to finish.
I would urge people to at least check him out.
|
|
Mrs Reeves
Egg
As a matter of fact, the world DOES revolve around Keanu Reeves!
Posts: 230
|
Post by Mrs Reeves on Aug 22, 2006 12:00:54 GMT
...Of course... George Bush's reaction is hard to comprehend as he couldn't be dragged away from that little goat story... but rather than thinking it was because he was already in on some conspiracy, I just thought it was because the guy is a total muppet ;D But what was the guy supposed to do? The news would have been shocking enough but to then scream "oh my God, America's being attacked" in front of a class of small children .... his reaction was probably a combinatinon of shock and not wanting to emotionally scar loads of kiddies ... ? |
|
|
|
Post by kreedkafer on Aug 24, 2006 1:13:45 GMT
...Of course... George Bush's reaction is hard to comprehend as he couldn't be dragged away from that little goat story... but rather than thinking it was because he was already in on some conspiracy, I just thought it was because the guy is a total muppet ;D But what was the guy supposed to do? The news would have been shocking enough but to then scream "oh my God, America's being attacked" in front of a class of small children .... his reaction was probably a combinatinon of shock and not wanting to emotionally scar loads of kiddies ... ? no he'd rather go and drop a ton of bombs on iraqi kiddies much more acceptable  |
|
