|
|
Post by anticulus on Apr 10, 2006 13:50:30 GMT
I think that guy who attacked The Undertaker on Smackdown may have been a strategically shaved yeti.
|
|
|
|
Post by suechez on Apr 18, 2006 14:12:46 GMT
Hi! This is one of those questions that drives you mad if you think about it for too long.  Who said that Yeti, or Bigfoot as I refer to them, have to live up mountains or in snowy places? Reports have been flying around the midlands about a bigfoot living in Cannock Chase. I know - I live in Cannock Chase! The local free paper - The Cannock Chase Post ran a comical series of send up articles asking for photographs of any possible sightings of the beast. So many people sent in pictures of apes and gorillas superimposed on other photographs of areas around the chase it was quite funny!  Having said that, the chase is an area of forest land. I have lived in and around the Chase for over 40 years and even though I spent most of my childhood exploring the area - there are parts that I have nenver covered, not have my children! Point being this.......... I do believe it MAY be possible for someone (or something) to live in this area and never be found! Bearing this in mind - why can't it be a bigfoot? |
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Apr 20, 2006 18:17:48 GMT
Its not you is it ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by suechez on Apr 21, 2006 12:37:33 GMT
Oh shucks! You sussed me out!  Now I'll have to go back into hiding - again!  |
|
|
|
Post by eminel on Apr 21, 2006 20:08:15 GMT
I don't think they are out there. We have satellites watching our every move. It would of been spotted well before now if it was out there. As for Nessie don't believe in that either. They done numerous tests and been all over that loch with sonar and nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by noddy on May 6, 2006 17:09:03 GMT
Yes eminel I agree with you in this world of big brother we are watched constantly by satellite thus rendering if any unusually large creature was happily living on the erath with us it would on the balance of probabillities by now have been noticed and we would know. Regarding the giant squid there has been numerous sightings over the years and its a lot harder for us to get deeper into the sea than to see the earth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amaris on May 7, 2006 1:04:56 GMT
If scientists are still discovering forms of bacteria in ancient caves that we had previously never known.....and finding fish etc in the deepest depths of the ocean that we would never have found without our improving technology, then I really think they would have found undisputable proof of these creatures by now!  |
|
|
|
Post by pops on May 13, 2006 14:21:10 GMT
Much as I would love them to exist I don't believe they do as I agree with others some form of proof even if just bones or bits of bodies would I think have been found by now. So sadly I have to vote no.  |
|
|
|
Post by steve on Sept 6, 2006 17:19:01 GMT
there are believers who remain convinced by the "evidence" of the 1967 Roger Patterson footage of bigfoot...and yknow, some of it is not that hard to believe!.....the sophistication of the "monkey suit" for that time was unheared of...this is before planet of the apes and 2001 and those were made by professional film makers and make up artists...this "bigfoot" suit, if thats what it is, is far superior to those in the movies of the time and why would anyone go to those lengths to make a shaky 16 second clip of it...
the muscle tone, the way it walks with knees bent which is a trait of the ape family, when humans walk our knees straighten as we take steps (even tho we are apes) ... the lengthened arms complete with elbow joint proportioned correctly, the breasts meaning it was a female..the speed of the walk considering it was such a large monkey suit...took a lot of effort to fake it...
it was also filmed several hundred miles away from hollywood (where the most sophisticated suit available (if indeed it was available back then) would have come from) so why would they bother doing that instead of finding a location nearer by? also, the figure was estimated to weigh around 500 pounds and stand over 7 feet tall...not impossible for it to be a hoax, but a very, very elaborate one indeed.....
im sitting on the fence with this...as ridiculous as it sounds..i'm leaning towards it not being real and yes, i agree that we should have found this creature by now, but like people have said, maybe theyre just good at hiding! i know it sounds funny...but im neither as convinced that something is out there than im as convinced its not...im just one bloke...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Sept 6, 2006 17:23:45 GMT
I am YETI to see any evidence that convinced me |
|
|
|
Post by steve on Sept 6, 2006 17:25:31 GMT
but u havent sasquatched the rumours either have you? |
|
|
|
Post by claire on Sept 6, 2006 17:30:51 GMT
i heard about one called harry, who lived with a family
that go by the name of "henderson" ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by steve on Sept 6, 2006 17:39:42 GMT
until a short while ago i was convinced it was a hoax...in fact i never really gave it a lot of thought...but then some believers who'd seen my dismissive comments decided to send me some info to look at and okay, i do see where theyre coming from....like i said, im on the fence...it sounds ridiculous but theres a funny old world out there...good old harry henderson, at least he's real
|
|
|
|
Post by Mystic Maj on Sept 7, 2006 5:02:26 GMT
I voted no, unless you can count the one I married  |
|
imapotato
Sperm
Victim of government created killer nano-robot infection
Posts: 58
|
Post by imapotato on Nov 3, 2006 6:58:08 GMT
No
Like Plumb said, with these creatures they would need a large breeding population, and if that were the case, we would have found at least something, feces, scent markings, hair, dead body, bones. Yet nothing
|
|
|
|
Post by Meercat on Nov 8, 2006 4:19:13 GMT
Being good at hide and seek is all very well, but how do they fair at Kerplunk?
|
|
Now I'll have to go back into hiding - again! 
