|
Post by tomroberts on Aug 2, 2010 22:47:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by traceyg on Aug 2, 2010 22:54:07 GMT
No offence to the Duchess of Cornwall but I wouldn't say the duchess looked youthfull at all
|
|
|
Post by The Legendary Barb on Aug 13, 2010 19:18:46 GMT
Homeopathy has not done a lot for his eyesight. though I will admit it, has done wonders for his sense of humour. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Ma'amJo on Aug 13, 2010 19:23:27 GMT
Ha ha, I like it, Barb.
|
|
Stephen
Egg
Get up, boy. I bet you can squeal. I bet you can squeal like a pig.
Posts: 212
|
Post by Stephen on Aug 21, 2010 2:21:41 GMT
good job homeopathy is bulls*it then otherwise we'd still be reading about the insufferable whore Princess
|
|
|
Post by kensington on Aug 24, 2010 12:18:14 GMT
Homeopathy has not done a lot for his eyesight. though I will admit it, has done wonders for his sense of humour. ;D Rofl never a truer word ;D
|
|
|
Post by valerie on Mar 9, 2011 8:39:20 GMT
we all knew certain mamebers of the royal family were barking mad, and that article proves it !!!
I so hope he doesnt become king.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Mar 9, 2011 23:45:15 GMT
Welcome to the forum Valerie. If you need anything just give me a shout
|
|
|
Post by valerie on Mar 10, 2011 16:47:36 GMT
I will thankyou
|
|
|
Post by blackadder on Mar 13, 2011 3:20:04 GMT
man your a scepticle suck-ss bunch even without any knowledge or argument to the point posed.
|
|
|
Post by The Legendary Barb on Mar 13, 2011 10:53:58 GMT
Well I will go to the point posed. If modern medical science and all the doctors, surgeons,and the x-rays of internal injuries that she sustained could not be treated by them " the medical team" how the hell could she have been save by homeopathy. What wondrous medicines do they have, that could have saved her life and brought about what could have only been described at the time,as a miracle.
|
|
|
Post by blackadder on Apr 15, 2011 21:19:01 GMT
Everyone always assumes they know what homeopathyn is for 1, what is it you say, natural treatment or rubbish rip=-off tereatment?
Is red tea from china a real medical treatment for arthritis or a herbal/homeopathy remedy as it is proved to work for a lot of people with arthritis?
Homeopathy is medicine if it works and is not if it does not. In my opinion.
Medicine is only a form of NATURAL compounds put together to form a new compound for medicine even thought he chinese have had herbal medicines for THOUSANDS of years before hand and some are recognise as mild cancer treatments and vascular ailment reducers as proven through tests so you are all assuming medicine is top and herbs are crap which is bull.
|
|
|
Post by Amaris on Apr 16, 2011 1:11:12 GMT
Can you provide scientific proof of that statement?
Homeopathy so far is not proven to work.
Actually in this statement you are confusing homeopathic remedies with scientifically proven natural sources of medicines.
|
|
|
Post by tomroberts on Apr 16, 2011 14:05:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jinx on Apr 23, 2011 8:27:15 GMT
we all knew certain mamebers of the royal family were barking mad, and that article proves it !!! You don't actually believe this story do you?
|
|
|
Post by blackadder on May 7, 2011 16:01:51 GMT
Asprin is from a plant, your honestly telling me that people did not chew the roots and shoots for pain relief when it is well documented, because you say it is a natural medicine and not homeopathy, kind of a retarded argument you have there, don't you think?
Natural medicine is the whole argument for using homeopathy, yes?
Rather than manufactured medicine.
|
|
|
Post by Ma'amJo on May 7, 2011 18:42:55 GMT
Natural medicine is NOT homeopathic. Simple as that.
Natural medicine involves the use of plants and suchlike as remedies for particular ailments.
Homeopathy does not contain plants - or anything else for that matter - other than water and a bit of sugar.
So no, natural medicine is not an argument for using homeopathy as the two are totally different.
|
|
|
Post by blackadder on May 7, 2011 18:58:51 GMT
The basic principle of homeopathy, known as the "law of similars", is "let like be cured by like." It was first stated by German physician Samuel Hahnemann in 1796. His "law of similars" is taken on his word[8] as an unproven assertion, and is not a true law of nature based on the scientific method.[9] Homeopathic remedies are prepared by serial dilution with shaking by forceful striking on an elastic body, which homeopaths term succussion. Each dilution followed by succussion is assumed to increase the effectiveness. Homeopaths call this process potentization. Dilution often continues until none of the original substance remains.[10] Apart from the symptoms, homeopaths examine aspects of the patient's physical and psychological state,[11] then homeopathic reference books known as repertories are consulted, and a remedy is selected based on the totality of symptoms.
Basically they are remedies for symptoms not cures, they stop pain and dis-comfort of symptoms. to make life easier and better.
|
|
|
Post by mrjohnno on May 7, 2011 20:59:00 GMT
is taken on his word[8] as an unproven assertion Which obviously points to its veracity
|
|
|
Post by watchman on May 7, 2011 22:29:46 GMT
Extract from : The House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee report into the Evidence base for homeopathy. The report was damning about the evidence base. It concluded, "In our view, the systematic reviews and meta-analyses conclusively demonstrate that homeopathic products perform no better than placebo." On the theoretical basis of homeopathy, they reported, "We conclude that the principle of like-cures-like is theoretically weak. It fails to provide a credible physiological mode of action for homeopathic products. We note that this is the settled view of medical science. We consider the notion that ultra-dilutions can maintain an imprint of substances previously dissolved in them to be scientifically implausible." For more info there is an excellent article over on QUACKOMETER ... www.quackometer.net/blog/2011/05/research-into-homeopathy-is-unethical.html
|
|