|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Nov 2, 2011 10:09:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by antmania on Nov 3, 2011 5:55:46 GMT
What that proves is that one floor was on fire, something everybody knew all along. Was that enough to ignite a symmetrical collapse. For this building to fall the way it did, all the support columns would have to give way at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Nov 3, 2011 15:52:52 GMT
I think aliens did it myself!! Can you prove they didnt!
|
|
|
|
Post by antmania on Nov 3, 2011 20:33:14 GMT
Nope but given the fact that before 9/11 no tall rise building had ever collapsed due to fire, it seems strange that 3 did on the same day
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Nov 3, 2011 23:20:38 GMT
Thats how you know it was aliens!!
|
|
|
|
Post by morganp on Nov 4, 2011 8:12:13 GMT
Nope but given the fact that before 9/11 no tall rise building had ever collapsed due to fire, it seems strange that 3 did on the same day Are you sure about that Ant?. morganp |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jinx on Nov 4, 2011 14:31:04 GMT
Nope but given the fact that before 9/11 no tall rise building had ever collapsed due to fire, it seems strange that 3 did on the same day I think you need to read this- www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm |
|
|
|
Post by star on Dec 14, 2011 14:08:47 GMT
Read something someone stated on the Daily Mail, on a David Icke thread, that there was a live news report of one of the twin towers going down-20 minutes before it actually fell down, in fact you could still see the tower still standing in the background, way off. Did puzzle me. Must find it to show you...
|
|
|
|
Post by star on Dec 14, 2011 14:09:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jinx on Dec 15, 2011 18:44:03 GMT
With the lack of even the smallest amount of hard evidence supporting their stories, conspiracy theorists have become more desperate to find anything which could be twisted to support them. Case in point: The WTC 7 was seen in the background of a BBC report while the reporter said the building had already collapsed. The story is that the reporters were given a "script" to say and these reporters stupidly read the lines before the building fell. Plain old common sense can dispatch this conspiracy story. Why do they choose to believe the more unlikely conspiracy story which suggests that at least some reporters of some news organizations were given a script? Especially when, much more logically, miscommunication could easily explain the video. Why in the WORLD would they need to give the reporters a head's up??? Why wouldn't they just blow the building up and let them report the collapse as they would have normally? What most likely, logically happened: While investigating and updating information on the collapse of the towers, someone at the BBC was given a report/press release that building 7 was going to collapse. [Edit: we now know they were monitoring the news from different outlets and that's where they learned of building 7.] According to the fire department, by 2:00PM they knew the building would soon collapse. Reporters KNEW this well before the collapse because there are videos of reporters talking about it before it happened. So we KNOW reporters were given information on WTC 7's imminent demise. We can conclude from this evidence that the fire department relayed information to reporters that the building was going to collapse. By the time the report reached the reporter at the BBC, it may have simply been miscommunicated from "About to collapse" to "Has collapsed". She even starts out by saying "Details are very, very sketchy". That alone should put this to rest. She didn't say 'Sketchy'. She didn't say 'very sketchy'. She said "very, very sketchy". It wouldn't be the first time reporters got something so completely wrong. They said it was a small plane at first, remember? They said Kerry choose Gephardt for VP, remember? They told the family members of trapped mine workers that their 13 loved ones were alive, all but one, when it was the other way around. Those are just a few glaring examples. I could go on... Reporters rush to be the first one with the news and often do a poor job of getting the facts straight. History is littered with examples of this. Even your average knuckle dragging, cave dwelling Neanderthal knows this. (My sincerest apologies Geico's Neanderthal man...) U Source www.debunking911.com/pull.htm |
|
