Sally Dublin and all of that

[imgettingat]

Firstly I think skeptics should be expected to supply some sort of evidence to support their arguments - There is a name for people who make unsubstantiated claims Um I think they are called Psychics !!!!

I was in two minds as to whether to include this unsubstantiated story

In the course of some work I am doing I came across this explanation for the Dublin episode 

The story was told to me by Someone I met In a pub who had been talking to an assistant manager at a theater Which Sally Morgan had performed. Who had got this explanation from someone worked At Dublin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SO TAKE THIS WITH THE APPROPRIATE PINCH OF SALT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It does however have a ring of truth to it


a) The Lighting guys HAD NOTHING TO TO WITH SALLY - They were not feeding her information - They did not know Sally Etc

b) What did happen was that 2 bored lighting Guys thought they would kill some time by testing out their Psychic skills by Predicting what sally was going to say next




Obviously if this is the explanation they were quite GOOD AT IT 

[Mr. Jon Donnis]

Jul 14, 2014 20:59:42 GMT imgettingat said:

Firstly I think skeptics should be expected to supply some sort of evidence to support their arguments - There is a name for people who make unsubstantiated claims Um I think they are called Psychics !!!!

I was in two minds as to whether to include this unsubstantiated story

In the course of some work I am doing I came across this explanation for the Dublin episode 

The story was told to me by Someone I met In a pub who had been talking to an assistant manager at a theater Which Sally Morgan had performed. Who had got this explanation from someone worked At Dublin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SO TAKE THIS WITH THE APPROPRIATE PINCH OF SALT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It does however have a ring of truth to it

a) The Lighting guys HAD NOTHING TO TO WITH SALLY - They were not feeding her information - They did not know Sally Etc

b) What did happen was that 2 bored lighting Guys thought they would kill some time by testing out their Psychic skills by Predicting what sally was going to say next

Obviously if this is the explanation they were quite GOOD AT IT 

Truth is that what was claimed to have happened was what did happen, the problem the Daily Mail had was that they had no proof.
It was well known for years that Sally was using such methods. a Few psychics who use headsets use the same method.
I once caught Simon Peters a fake psychic using that exact method after he suffered a technical hitch during a performance and his mic picked up the feed he was getting in his ear, and played it out through the speakers.

He was literally repeating word for word what he was being told.

Sally Morgan is an obvious fraud, remember the Daily Mail settled the case out of court, so Sally Morgan never won the case.
And also keep in mind she was suing them for what they claimed was the method of her fraud and not that she was a fraud. Slight but importance difference.