Post by aliennation345 on Jan 24, 2007 23:00:25 GMT
I found this article on the net about the days of Derek in Granada Breeze. Even then he was attatched to the phoneline scam, whether directly or indirectly.
www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=423.html
Here is the article:
Complaints Reports
Programme Complaints & Interventions Report
These reports are case summaries of complaints which appeared to raise issues of substance in relation to the interpretation of the ITC Programme Code. Summary statistics of non-substantive complaints can be found in the full reports which are obtainable from the ITC.
Showing Complaints & Interventions Report for PSYCHIC LIVETIME PREDICTIONS WITH DEREK ACORAH
Channel: Granada Breeze
Date & time: June 2001
Complaint from: Staff monitoring
Background
The sponsor of these programmes offered a recorded Tarot reading via a premium rate telephone service. The sponsor’s telephone number along with call cost information was included in the sponsor’s credits.
Issue
ITC rules require advertising for premium rate services to comply with the ICSTIS (Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services) Code of Practice. This Code requires all promotions for premium rate services to include call costs. However, Rule 11.1.4 of the ITC Code of Programme Sponsorship states “Credits must not contain any direct exhortations to purchase or rent the sponsor’s goods or services. They may not include specific references to the attributes, benefits or prices of those products or services”.
Assessment
Granada Sky Broadcasting stated the call cost information was provided purely to inform and protect their viewers and the credits did not exhort or encourage viewers to purchase the service. However, as soon as they were aware of the conflict with the ITC Codes, all credits referring to premium rate telephone numbers were removed from air.
The ITC welcomed the licensee’s swift action. While noting the credits contained no exhortations to purchase, the ITC reminded the licensee that the Code of Programme Sponsorship prohibits price information in credits in all circumstances, not only when accompanied by a direct encouragement to purchase the sponsor’s product. Because of this, telephone numbers for premium rate services cannot appear in sponsor credits and comply with the ITC codes.
Conclusion
www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=423.html
Here is the article:
Complaints Reports
Programme Complaints & Interventions Report
These reports are case summaries of complaints which appeared to raise issues of substance in relation to the interpretation of the ITC Programme Code. Summary statistics of non-substantive complaints can be found in the full reports which are obtainable from the ITC.
Showing Complaints & Interventions Report for PSYCHIC LIVETIME PREDICTIONS WITH DEREK ACORAH
Channel: Granada Breeze
Date & time: June 2001
Complaint from: Staff monitoring
Background
The sponsor of these programmes offered a recorded Tarot reading via a premium rate telephone service. The sponsor’s telephone number along with call cost information was included in the sponsor’s credits.
Issue
ITC rules require advertising for premium rate services to comply with the ICSTIS (Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services) Code of Practice. This Code requires all promotions for premium rate services to include call costs. However, Rule 11.1.4 of the ITC Code of Programme Sponsorship states “Credits must not contain any direct exhortations to purchase or rent the sponsor’s goods or services. They may not include specific references to the attributes, benefits or prices of those products or services”.
Assessment
Granada Sky Broadcasting stated the call cost information was provided purely to inform and protect their viewers and the credits did not exhort or encourage viewers to purchase the service. However, as soon as they were aware of the conflict with the ITC Codes, all credits referring to premium rate telephone numbers were removed from air.
The ITC welcomed the licensee’s swift action. While noting the credits contained no exhortations to purchase, the ITC reminded the licensee that the Code of Programme Sponsorship prohibits price information in credits in all circumstances, not only when accompanied by a direct encouragement to purchase the sponsor’s product. Because of this, telephone numbers for premium rate services cannot appear in sponsor credits and comply with the ITC codes.
Conclusion