Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2013 21:40:32 GMT
I'm just a little bit interested in what sort of evidence an athiest should except for the existance of God. Some things you can proove exist. For instance i know flowers exist because i can see them, pick them smell them etc. Should believe in a god require this sort of concreate evidence?
|
|
|
|
Post by watchman on Dec 17, 2013 23:51:01 GMT
"Should believe in a god require this sort of concreate evidence?"
Pretty much ... yes.
(Or at the very least some sort of evidence .... any sort of evidence ... really.)
By the way ... "concreate" ... con-create? .... Typo or clever pun ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Dec 18, 2013 11:33:55 GMT
Proof God exists, hmmmm. Well for a magical being capable of anything, the least we should expect is for him to prove his existence, so he could appear, and fix climate change in an instance, or cure the worlds ill. Change the laws of physics so that food can be grown anywhere on the planet.
Just a couple of easy things like that would do, afterall he is god
|
|
|
|
Post by mrjohnno on Dec 19, 2013 16:27:50 GMT
Anything that can be tested.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2014 13:37:27 GMT
I just want evidence that is beyond dispute. I've never been a big fan of 'faith'.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrjohnno on Jan 13, 2014 15:01:34 GMT
I just want evidence that is beyond dispute. I've never been a big fan of 'faith'. There isn't any which is why it requires faith. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Jan 13, 2014 15:56:34 GMT
There is 0% evidence in God, end of discussion, only way to believe is through faith
|
|
|
|
Post by Titch on Mar 20, 2016 17:58:46 GMT
Hmmmm I'm not a believer.
|
|
