|
Post by Kim on May 20, 2006 18:47:40 GMT
Where did that little gem come from Jon?
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on May 20, 2006 21:32:22 GMT
Where did that little gem come from Jon? Top Gear
|
|
|
Post by Kim on May 20, 2006 21:52:08 GMT
oh well has to be correct then!!!!!!!! 
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on May 21, 2006 8:50:01 GMT
yep
|
|
|
Post by katy on May 21, 2006 21:50:42 GMT
where on earth did you glean this highly dubious nugget of "information" from? *reads further down thread* oh, top gear. uh-huh. They're not biased at all are they? Did you not consider that that was rubbish? does it even sound remotely likely to be true? ;D If you believe that then you are a deluded fool. Don't listen to government or top gear. listen to the scientists, ideally the ones not working for a company that wants to carry on polluting and is therefore trying to manipulate the figures to make it look like nothing is wrong. . One volcano erupts over a period of hours, days, maybe weeks. The sulphur gets rained out within weeks. Anthropological emissions are constant, and increasing. btw; good post pandora! 
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on May 21, 2006 22:16:33 GMT
Yep!
Top gear rules! They are my Derek Acorah
But a supervolcanoe is what they now consider to be one of the real explanations for the death of the dinosaurs
|
|
|
Post by katy on May 22, 2006 12:55:25 GMT
Not its not. The major hypothesis for the extinction of the dinosaurs is a meteorite. Some scientists postulated the coincidence of the eruption of the Deccan traps being a factor, but this is generally considered to be unlikely
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on May 22, 2006 13:37:45 GMT
Either way no one knows. Both hypothesis are equally accepted
|
|
|
Post by katy on May 22, 2006 14:16:23 GMT
No they're not.
The meteorite hypothesis is much more credible and has far more supporting evidence; the Chicxulub crater in the Yucatan peninsula and the 95% reduction in plankton which is indistinguishable time-wise from the crater for a start!
Whereas the Deccan Traps being a factor is highly speculative; all the other mass lava eruptions (and there are many in Earths history) do not have a mass-extinction associated with them. The amount of sulphur produced is considered highly unlikely to have caused enough environment disturbance to have killed off the the dinosaurs.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on May 22, 2006 14:46:31 GMT
dont confuse me with science
|
|
|
Post by katy on May 23, 2006 7:13:02 GMT
ok lol! ;D
|
|