|
|
Post by Amaris on Oct 10, 2007 10:35:57 GMT
Says it like it is  |
|
|
|
Post by star on Oct 10, 2007 12:17:34 GMT
Says it like it is The comments underneath are pretty forthright  |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Oct 10, 2007 13:23:34 GMT
Did you know that most of the 9/11 bombers were Saudi's, yet we went after Afganistan and Iraq! hmmm I wonder why
|
|
bagpipe
Noob
this was the only avatar i liked!:)
Posts: 22
|
Post by bagpipe on Oct 10, 2007 14:10:52 GMT
Do you think he is hiding in a bomb shelter somewhere?  no alcohol,no morning after pill! thats it im moving to australia! |
|
|
|
Post by bobdezon on Oct 10, 2007 15:34:41 GMT
The saudis are americas allie thats why they didnt wipe out saudia arabia instead of iraq, they need to retain relations for the oil and arms deals. Its all about money not stability as they claim. |
|
|
|
Post by Amaris on Oct 11, 2007 0:31:10 GMT
The saudis are americas allie thats why they didnt wipe out saudia arabia instead of iraq, they need to retain relations for the oil and arms deals. Its all about money not stability as they claim. I agree, this link I kept because it shows Iraq was about the oil ( which we knew anyway but hey) news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.eceThis paragraph was particularly interesting!... The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said. And I believe I did read that the law was passed. I think the only other proof needed that these wars are about the oil is that other corrupt governments of the world i.e. Mugabe & Kim Jong in North Korea are left to their sadistic regimes, if I remember rightly didn't they attack Saddam for that and those "weapons of mass destruction". Don't get me wrong I think it would only have been a matter of time before Saddam had those weapons but North Korea are suspected of having them too, where is the invasion to protect our world from that threat?? Sorry got carried away from thread there .... But my point is that it is always about the oil never about protecting us from threat of war. Wonder why we never trust politicians |
|
|
|
Post by bobdezon on Oct 11, 2007 2:25:32 GMT
well mugabe they wont touch because nobody cares about the plight of africa (sad but true) and well the americans dont like fighting in korea for obvious reasons (we do deserts not jungles said stormin norman)
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocktron on Oct 11, 2007 6:37:35 GMT
I love the way Pat covers his anger in beautiful words. Mine would be F****** Bl**** Stupid M****** wake up! and start thinking for yourself! But hey..who am I? (let me think about that for a sec.. Done!) |
|
|
|
Post by Amaris on Oct 11, 2007 10:40:16 GMT
But hey..who am I? (let me think about that for a sec.. Done!) ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
no alcohol,no morning after pill! thats it im moving to australia!
