|
Post by Mike on Mar 2, 2009 17:57:19 GMT
www.jerrolddonington.comI was taking a break from my work this evening, and was googling around as you do and i came across something that i thought i should bring to BP's attention. Jerrold Donington claims he is a 'Healer and Spirit Surgeon' from Maidenhead, Berkshire literally a 15 minute drive away from me which gives me some embarrassment actually. He claims to have 10 years service in spiritual healing and shows proudly 2 pretty useless 'qualifications' as proof of his experience. Now as this is nothing new of course the page that did annoy me was his 'Spiritual Healing' page which openly claims to have cured several areas of the body, including the big one 'Cancer' and also implies that he can cure it again. With the help of Hayley, who captured the pages kindly for me, we both agreed that BP should be told. i565.Report this post to Admin please.com/albums/ss100/nohey1/cancerclaimjeff.jpg If the image is small click on it again it should expand. I'm tempted to lay the flat of my sword on his head, but i thought it would be better to report here first. He also claims to perform 'distance healing' which means he basically sits around at home all day while the customer does a range of things he tells them to do. All for £25 per half hour. I'm pretty disgusted at best. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by romany on Mar 2, 2009 18:51:26 GMT
What's 'psychic attack?' At a guess, I'd say it's when a psychic or sensitive is deluged by the spirits or messages of passed souls who all want to get in touch at once. Am I right, or nearly right? Another thing to Google this evening. No I'm wrong! Lol! If you're interested, this is psychic attack: www.brothermichael.org.uk/skills/protection.htmAnd yes, this bloke does look dodgy. The website doesn't even look particularly inspiring either.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Mar 2, 2009 22:16:41 GMT
Hi Mike, first port of call is Trading Standards, since he is close to you, print out a copy of any claims, and go in person to your local trading standards to report him.
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 3, 2009 0:15:31 GMT
I will be doing that ASAP.
Apprently he also has a host of assistants, seems like a rackett to me.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Jon Donnis on Mar 3, 2009 17:08:43 GMT
please let us know how you get on Also make sure to keep a copy of any and all correspondance. As well as screen grabs or photos of any claims
|
|
|
Post by theminx on Mar 3, 2009 22:48:23 GMT
A psychic not far from where I live posted in his window that he was a healer etc and the Trading Standards made him remove all advertisements after complaints from customers, mainly because he claimed to heal cancer and other ailments?
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 5, 2009 17:49:11 GMT
Update le guys:
He removed all of the cancer claims and reworked his website to hide the fact it was ever there, he also somehow emailed me, which im slightly worried about to ask if it was 'to my liking'. I'm still wondering how he got my email if it is 'hidden' on this site.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2009 18:52:59 GMT
He's psychic - durr!
Realistically though, could it be something to do with that Berkshire Paranormal Group you wrote about on here some time ago? Maybe they know him? They had your email from when you were a member on their forums...
|
|
|
Post by Amaris on Mar 5, 2009 19:48:09 GMT
he also somehow emailed me, which im slightly worried about to ask if it was 'to my liking'. I'm still wondering how he got my email if it is 'hidden' on this site. Your email is definitely hidden on here Mike, could he have got it from trading standards?
|
|
|
Post by bobdezon on Mar 5, 2009 21:35:40 GMT
mikes email is also on another website online. I wont reveal which one, but it is there.
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 6, 2009 13:22:31 GMT
A personal one Bob? Or another mate?
|
|
|
Post by bobdezon on Mar 6, 2009 20:12:50 GMT
I will PM you the link.
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 7, 2009 16:32:39 GMT
Cheers Bob, yeah thats an age old site. I'll have to remove that. How he found it is beyond me though, Hayle's way seems more probable.
|
|
|
Post by bobdezon on Mar 7, 2009 17:06:24 GMT
Seems most likely to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Mar 7, 2009 18:16:21 GMT
The good thing is, the cancer claim is off, unfortuently he's still misleading which = the downside =\
|
|