|
Post by Amaris on May 25, 2010 23:13:48 GMT
Removable Truths A memory expert's inexpungible past. By William Saletan Updated Tuesday, May 25, 2010, at 7:14 AM ET In the fall of 1991, Elizabeth Loftus sat in her office at the University of Washington, listening to a tape-recorded story. The storyteller, a 14-year-old boy named Chris Coan, was describing a visit to the University City shopping mall in Spokane, Wash., when he was 5. "I think I went over to look at the toy store, the Kay-Bee toys," he recalled. "We got lost, and I was looking around and I thought, 'Uh-oh. I'm in trouble now.' " He remembered his feelings: "I thought I was never going to see my family again. I was really scared, you know. And then this old man, I think he was wearing a blue flannel, came up to me." The man, old and balding with glasses, helped Chris find his parents. It was a vivid story, told with sincerity and emotion. But the events Chris described had never happened. Chris's elder brother, Jim, had made it up as an assignment for Loftus' cognitive psychology class. Jim, pretending the story was real, had fed Chris the basics—the name of the mall, the old man, the flannel shirt, the crying—and Chris, believing his brother's fabrication, had filled in the rest. He had proved what Loftus suspected: If you were carefully coached to remember something, and if you tried hard enough, you could do it. Read more HereHere is a video with Elizabeth Loftus
|
|
|
Post by The Legendary Barb on May 26, 2010 8:24:59 GMT
Is this a sort of brain washing Amaris?. I believe it is. This I think as been used before to experiment by the powers that be of a few counties. If it can produce a result as stated from a young lad, what price from professionals. It is very frightening. and whos to say its not being used now.
|
|
|
Post by trouble on Jun 29, 2010 11:54:09 GMT
I think this proves though that past life regression is merely the hypnotist, whether knowingly or unknowingly, is 'leading' the subject in 'remembering' their old lives. Under hypnosis I think we are even more susceptible to being made to believe things that aren't actually factual. Or even helped to remember things we may have read at some point through our lives; especially in today's technological age where we have access to all manner of information.
_____________________________
You have enemies ? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life. - Anon
|
|
|
Post by fluffet on Jun 29, 2010 18:46:12 GMT
I think it only proves the ease with which the mind fills in spaces when given a starter for ten.
Every book, article, website you've ever read, every story that ever been read or told to you, every TV show , every film, every place you've ever been or heard of, every conversation you've ever had...that's a huge amount of information absorbed and available to use at any given moment in the right circumstance and situation...when you look at it that way for me there is little doubt of the power of your imagination and memory to create experiences from the parts to make a false whole.
Add to that the slightest persuasion or leading and the ability to "remember" something you haven't actually experienced in the first person is even greater.
|
|
|
Post by paddyrex on Jun 30, 2010 15:26:12 GMT
My daughter often recounts with great accuracy an incident from a family holiday when a seagull swooped down and snatched a chicken leg out of my hand. She can even tell you where she was sitting at the time and what she was eating. This is all despite the fact that it happened a good two years before she was born.
It took us a while to convince her she wasn't there and had built herself into a story that she had only heard.
Memories live in our head and without some sort of verifiable evidence outside of that they need to be treated cautiously.
|
|
|
Post by trouble on Jun 30, 2010 17:21:13 GMT
Totally agree Paddyrex; what we need to constantly remember is that we are purported to only use 10% of our brain's capacity - what does the other 90% do? I doubt that it is idle. Our minds are complex machines and need to be treated with the same care as any other computer would (unlike me who dropped mine on my foot.....) THat would be my laptop and not my brain, BTW - my brain is small enough not to have caused the same damage to my foot that my laptop did. Seriously though, I think, as you say, our memories change over time - some remain clear and others cloud. Nothing is static; to say a memory is an absolute truth is to enter dangerous ground.
|
|